Muheim, R., Sjöberg, S., Pinzon-Rodriguez, A. 2016. Polarized light modulates light-dependent magnetic compass orientation in birds. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences 113: 1654-1659.
Muijres, F. T., Johansson, L. C., Barfield, R., Wolf, M., Spedding, G. R., Hedenström, A. 2008. Leading-edge vortex improves lift in slow-flying bats. Science 319: 1250-1253.
Muir, J., Herbst, C. T., Hawes, J. E., O’Mahoney, T., Dunn, J. C. 2025. Nonlinear phenomena in mammalian vocal communication: an introduction and scoping review. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences 380: 20240017.
Mukherjee, I., Das, S., Paul, B., Annagiri, S. 2023. The impact of prior and current information of a new nest on relocation dynamics in an Indian ant. Ethology 129: 200-211.
Mukhin, A., Chernetsov, N., Kishkinev, D. 2008. Acoustic information as a distant cue for habitat recognition by nocturnally migrating passerines during landfall. Behavioral Ecology 19: 716-723.
Mulà, C., Thorogood, R., Hämäläinen, L. 2022. Social information use about novel aposematic prey depends on the intensity of the observed cue. Behavioral Ecology 33: 825-832.
Mulard, H., Aubin, T., White, J. F., Hatch, S. A., Danchin, É. 2008. Experimental evidence of vocal recognition in young and adult black-legged kittiwakes. Animal Behaviour 76: 1855-1861.
Mulcahy, N. J. 2016. Orangutans (Pongo abelii) seek information about tool functionality in a metacognition tubes task. J Comp Psychol 130: 391-399.
Mulcahy, N. J., Call, J. 2006. How great apes perform on a modified trap-tube task. Animal Cognition 9: 193-199.
Mulcahy, N. J., Hedge, V. 2012. Are great apes tested with an abject object-choice task?. Animal Behaviour 83: 313-321.
Mulcahy, N. J., Schubiger, M. N. 2014. Can orangutans (Pongo abelii) infer tool functionality?. Animal Cognition 17: 657-669.
Mulder, Raoul A., Hall, Michelle L. 2013. Animal behaviour: A song and dance about lyrebirds. Current Biology 23: R518-R519.
Muleta, M. G., Schausberger, P. 2013. Smells familiar: group-joining decisions of predatory mites are mediated by olfactory cues of social familiarity. Animal Behaviour 86: 507-512.
Müller, C. A. 2010. Do anvil-using banded mongooses understand means–end relationships? A field experiment. Animal Cognition 13: 325-330.
Müller, C. A., Cant, M. A. 2010. Imitation and traditions in wild banded mongooses. Current Biology 20: 1171-1175.
Müller, C. A., Manser, M. B. 2007. Nasty neighbours rather than ‘dear enemies’ in a social carnivore. Proceedings of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences 274: 959-965.
Müller, C. A., Manser, M. B. 2008. Mutual recognition of pups and providers in the cooperatively breeding banded mongoose. Animal Behaviour 75: 1683-1692.
Müller, C. A., Manser, M. B. 2008. The information banded mongooses extract from heterospecific alarms. Animal Behaviour 75: 897-904.
Müller, C. A., Mayer, C., Dörrenberg, S., Huber, L., Range, F. 2011. Female but not male dogs respond to a size constancy violation. Biology Letters 7: 689-691.
Müller, C. A., Riemer, S., Range, F., Huber, L. 2014. Dogs’ use of the solidity principle: revisited. Animal Cognition 17: 821-825.

<<First    < Previous    399 400 401 402 403 404 405     Next >    Last >>