 | Amici, F., Widdig, A. 2019. An evolutionary perspective on the development of primate sociality. Behavioral Ecology and Sociobiology 73: 116. |
 | Amici, F., Widdig, A., Lehmann, J., Majolo, B. 2019. A meta-analysis of interindividual differences in innovation. Animal Behaviour 155: 257-268. |
 | Amiel, J. J., Bao, S., Shine, R. 2017. The effects of incubation temperature on the development of the cortical forebrain in a lizard. Animal Cognition 20: 117-125. |
| Amiel, J. J., Lindström, T., Shine, R. 2014. Egg incubation effects generate positive correlations between size, speed and learning ability in young lizards. Animal Cognition 17: 337-347. |
| Amiel, J. J., Shine, R. 2012. Hotter nests produce smarter young lizards. Biology Letters 8: 372-4. |
 | Amita, H., Kawamori, A., Matsushima, T. 2010. Social influences of competition on impulsive choices in domestic chicks. Biology Letters 6: 183-186. |
| Amo, L., López, P., Martín, J. 2006. Can wall lizards combine chemical and visual cues to discriminate predatory from non-predatory snakes inside refuges?. Ethology 112: 478-484. |
| Amo, L., López, P., Martı́n, J. 2004. Wall lizards combine chemical and visual cues of ambush snake predators to avoid overestimating risk inside refuges. Animal Behaviour 67: 647-653. |
| Amo, L., Tomás, G., López-García, A. 2017. Role of chemical and visual cues of mammalian predators in nest defense in birds. Behavioral Ecology and Sociobiology 71: 49. |
 | Amodio, P., Boeckle, M., Schnell, A. K., Ostojic, L., Fiorito, G., Clayton, N. S. 2019. Shell loss in cephalopods: Trigger for, or by-product of, the evolution of intelligence? A reply to Mollo et al.. Trends Ecol Evol 34: 690-692. |
| Amodio, P., Boeckle, M., Schnell, A. K., Ostojíc, L., Fiorito, G., Clayton, N. S. 2019. Grow smart and die young: Why did cephalopods evolve intelligence?. Trends Ecol Evol 34: 45-56. |
 | Amrein, H., Thorne, N. 2005. Gustatory perception and behavior in Drosophila melanogaster. Current Biology 15: R673-R684. |
| Amy, M., Leboucher, G. 2007. Male canaries can visually eavesdrop on conspecific food interactions. Animal Behaviour 74: 57-62. |
| Amy, M., Salvin, P., Leboucher, G. 2018. Chapter Six - The Functions of Female Calls in Birds. Animal Behaviour 50: 243-271. |
| Amy, M., Sprau, P., de Goede, P., Naguib, M. 2010. Effects of personality on territory defence in communication networks: a playback experiment with radio-tagged great tits. Proceedings of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences 277: 3685-92. |
| Amy, M., van Oers, K., Naguib, M. 2012. Worms under cover: relationships between performance in learning tasks and personality in great tits (Parus major). Animal Cognition 15: 763-770. |
| Anciães, M., Prum, R. O. 2008. Manakin display and visiting behaviour: a comparative test of sensory drive. Animal Behaviour 75: 783-790. |
| Ancillotto, L., Allegrini, C., Serangeli, M. T., Jones, G., Russo, D. 2015. Sociality across species: spatial proximity of newborn bats promotes heterospecific social bonding. Behavioral Ecology 26: 293-299. |
| Ancillotto, L., Pafundi, D., Cappa, F., Chaverri, G., Gamba, M., Cervo, R., Russo, D. 2022. Bats mimic hymenopteran insect sounds to deter predators. Current Biology 32: R408-R409. |
| Ancillotto, L., Serangeli, M. T., Russo, D. 2012. Spatial proximity between newborns influences the development of social relationships in bats. Ethology 118: 331-340. |
<<First < Previous 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 Next > Last >>