 | Dammhahn, M., Kappeler, P. M. 2009. Females go where the food is: does the socio-ecological model explain variation in social organisation of solitary foragers?. Behavioral Ecology and Sociobiology 63: 939–952. |
 | Damphousse, C. C., Joshi, K., Abu-Alhaija, J., Marrone, D. F. 2025. A rose in any other context: Context alters the responses of both birds and rodents to novel objects. Brain Behavior and Evolution 101: 64–72. |
| Damphousse, C. C., Marrone, D. F., Miller, N. 2019. Pair foraging degrades socially transmitted food preferences in rats. Animal Cognition 22: 1027–1037. |
 | Danchin, E., Nöbel, S., Pocheville, A., Dagaeff, A.-C., Demay, L., Alphand, M., Ranty-Roby, S., van Renssen, L., Monier, M., Gazagne, E., Allain, M., Isabel, G. 2018. Cultural flies: Conformist social learning in fruitflies predicts long-lasting mate-choice traditions. Science 362: 1025. |
 | Danel, S., Chiffard-Carricaburu, J., Bonadonna, F., Nesterova, A. P. 2021. Exclusion in the field: wild brown skuas find hidden food in the absence of visual information. Animal Cognition 24: 867–876. |
| Danel, S., Rebout, N., Bonadonna, F., Biro, D. 2023. Wild skuas can follow human-given behavioural cues when objects resemble natural food. Animal Cognition 26: 709–713. |
| Danel, S., Rebout, N., Bonadonna, F., Biro, D. 2024. Sex predicts response to novelty and problem-solving in a wild bird with female-biased sexual dimorphism. Proceedings of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences 291: 20242277. |
| Danel, S., Rebout, N., Kemp, L. 2023. Social diffusion of new foraging techniques in the Southern ground-hornbill (Bucorvus leadbeateri). Learn Behav 51: 153–165. |
| Danel, S., Troina, G., Dufour, V., Bailly-Bechet, M., von Bayern, A. M. P., Osiurak, F. 2020. Social learning in great white pelicans (Pelecanus onocrotalus): A preliminary study. Learn Behav 48: 344–350. |
| Danel, S., von Bayern, A. M. P., Osiurak, F. 2022. Great white pelicans (Pelecanus onocrotalus) fail to use tools flexibly in problem-solving tasks. Ethology 128: 99–110. |
| Dani, F. R., Jones, G. R., Destri, S., Spencer, S. H., Turillazzi, S. 2001. Deciphering the recognition signature within the cuticular chemical profile of paper wasps. Animal Behaviour 62: 165–171. |
| Daniel, A. M. 2026. Are mice a bad model for successive negative contrast?. Learn Behav 54: 220–228. |
 | Daniel, D. K., Bhat, A. 2023. Correlations begin at home: drivers of co-occurrence patterns in personality and cognitive ability in wild populations of zebrafish. Animal Cognition 26: 1381–1394. |
| Daniel, M. M. M., Schluessel, V. 2020. Serial reversal learning in freshwater stingrays (Potamotrygon motoro). Animal Cognition 23: 109–119. |
| Daniel, T. A., Wright, A. A., Katz, J. S. 2015. Abstract-concept learning of difference in pigeons. Animal Cognition 18: 831–837. |
| Daniel, T. A., Wright, A. A., Katz, J. S. 2016. The oddity preference effect and the concept of difference in pigeons. Learn Behav 44: 320–328. |
| Daniels, B. C., Krakauer, D. C., Flack, J. C. 2012. Sparse code of conflict in a primate society. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences 109: 14259–14264. |
| Daniels, C. W., Balsam, P. D. 2023. Prior experience modifies acquisition trajectories via response–strategy sampling. Animal Cognition 26: 1217–1239. |
| Daniels, C. W., Laude, J. R., Zentall, T. R. 2014. Transitive inference by pigeons: Does the geometric presentation of the stimuli make a difference?. Animal Cognition 17: 973–981. |
| Daniels, S. E., Fanelli, R. E., Gilbert, A., Benson-Amram, S. 2019. Behavioral flexibility of a generalist carnivore. Animal Cognition 22: 387–396. |
<<First < Previous 141 142 143 144 145 146 147 Next > Last >>